Legal Opinion

Davis v. Radford

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 1951No. 96PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DeviN, J..The appeal is from a judgment in the court below overruling the demurrer of defendant Dr. T. 0. Smith Company to the answer and cross-complaint of defendant Radford. Briefly stated, the pleadings present this picture: Defendant Radford, a retail merchant, having been sued by a customer for breach of the implied warranty of wholesomeness and consequent damage in the sale of an article for human consumption, known as “Westsal,” has had Dr. T. C. Smith Company (hereinafter referred to as Smith Company), a wholesale dealer, made party defendant (Ins. Co. v. Motor Lines, 225 N.C. 588, 35…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Enloe v. Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Mullen v. Town of LouisburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Gregg v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Ward v. Morehead City Sea Food Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Guthrie v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Perfecting Service Co. v. Product Development & Sales Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Greco v. Bucciconi Engineering CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
  5. Wyatt v. North Carolina Equipment CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API