Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Town of Louisburg

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 21, 1945PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

Plaintiff has properly preserved and brought forward his exception to the order of Harris, J., making the Power Company a party defendant. In our opinion the exception is meritorious and must be sustained.

A third party, before he will be permitted to become a party defendant in a pending action, must show that he has' some legal interest in the subject matter of the litigation. His interest must be of such direct and immediate character that he will either gain or lose by the direct operation and effect of the judgment, and it must be involved in the subject matter of the action. One whose…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Harlem Gas Co. v. . Mayor, C., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1865
  2. Wightman v. Evanston Yaryan Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. City of Hickory v. Catawba CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Pue v. HoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Trust Co. v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Lee v. . Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. River Birch Associates v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Watson Industries, Inc. v. ShawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Virmani v. Presbyterian Health Services Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Strickland Ex Rel. Steed v. HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API