Legal Opinion

Wyatt v. North Carolina Equipment Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 23, 1960No. 169PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

A warranty, express or implied, is contractual in nature. Whether considered collateral thereto or an integral part thereof, a warranty is an element of a contract of sale. 77 C.J.S., Sales § 302; 46 Am. Jur., Sales § 299.

“The obligation arising under a warranty is that of an undertaking or promise that the goods shall be as represented or, more specifically, a contract of indemnity against loss by reason of defects therein.” 77 C.J.S., Sales § 302(d). “The effect of an express warranty undoubtedly is to bind the seller absolutely for the existence of the warranted qualities. If an implied…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Enloe v. Charlotte Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  2. Smith v. Gulf Oil Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Davis v. RadfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Thomason v. Ballard & Ballard Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Simpson v. American Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Boudreau v. BaughmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  2. Perfecting Service Co. v. Product Development & Sales Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Raftery v. Wm. C. Vick Construction Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Mary Kate Brendle, Administratrix of the Estate of William Charles Brendle, Deceased v. The General Tire and Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  5. Cockerham v. WardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API