Legal Opinion

Guthrie v. City of Durham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1915PublishedCited by 34 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Daniels, J., at November Term, 1914, of DURHAM.

1Opinion of the Court

HOKE J., dissenting; ALLEN, J., concurring in dissenting opinion. This is an appeal from the refusal of the court to grant the motion of the defendant to make A. E. Lloyd a party defendant.

The plaintiff, who was an infant 11 years of age at the time of the injury complained of, brings this action by his next friend against the city of Durham for damages caused by its alleged negligence in permitting a dangerous excavation, immediately adjoining one of its streets, to be insufficiently guarded and protected, alleging that this negligence resulted in injuries to the plaintiff. A. E. Lloyd, who…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gregg v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Brown v. Town of LouisburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. Dillon v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  4. Aiken v. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. City of Raleigh v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Hunsucker v. High Point Bending & Chair Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Charnock v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. Brown v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  5. Newsome v. SurrattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API