Legal Opinion
Babe's Cabaret v. City of Scottsdale
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 18, 2000No. 1 CA-CV 98-0102PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GERBER, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellants challenge a Scottsdale ordinance regulating erotic entertainment at establishments serving liquor. We must determine if state alcohol law has preempted local regulation in this area.
Facts and Procedural History
¶2 Stephanie’s Babes, Inc., d.b.a. Babe’s Cabaret, and Wisnowski, Inc., d.b.a. Diamond Girls (the appellants), are establishments licensed by the State Department of Liquor Licenses and Control (the department) to sell intoxicating liquor. They also feature erotic entertainment. In 1993, Scottsdale adopted Ordinance No. 2521, regulating sexually…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. PrentissArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- City of Scottsdale v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- City of Prescott v. Town of Chino ValleyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Flagstaff Vending Co. v. City of FlagstaffArizona Supreme Court · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bunker's Glass Co. v. Pilkington PlCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- McMann v. City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- City of Tucson v. Consumers for Retail ChoiceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Wonders v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Jachimek v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.