Jachimek v. State
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SNOW, Judge.
¶ 1 William George Jachimek, President of Central Pawn, Inc., appeals the superior court’s judgment upholding the validity of Phoenix City Code § 10-151(A). Section 10-151(A) requires pawnbrokers to pay a $3.00 transaction fee for each pawn transaction report filed with the Phoenix Police Department pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 44-1625(A) (2003). The superior court concluded that the ordinance imposes a permissible fee rather than an invalid tax, and that State law does not preempt the City from assessing the fee. For the following reasons, we…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- San Juan Cellular Telephone Company, Etc. v. Public Service Commission of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Bidart Brothers, a California Corporation v. The California Apple CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Eaton Fruit Co. v. California Spray-Chemical Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
- Stewart v. Verde River Irrigation & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1937
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- HAWAII INSURERS COUNCIL v. LingleHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
- Biggs v. BetlachCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- Northwest Fire District v. U.S. Home of Arizona Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Biggs v. betlach/maciasArizona Supreme Court · 2017