Legal Opinion

Jachimek v. State

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 21, 2003No. 1 CA-CV 02-0133PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SNOW, Judge.

¶ 1 William George Jachimek, President of Central Pawn, Inc., appeals the superior court’s judgment upholding the validity of Phoenix City Code § 10-151(A). Section 10-151(A) requires pawnbrokers to pay a $3.00 transaction fee for each pawn transaction report filed with the Phoenix Police Department pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 44-1625(A) (2003). The superior court concluded that the ordinance imposes a permissible fee rather than an invalid tax, and that State law does not preempt the City from assessing the fee. For the following reasons, we…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. San Juan Cellular Telephone Company, Etc. v. Public Service Commission of Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  2. Bidart Brothers, a California Corporation v. The California Apple CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Eaton Fruit Co. v. California Spray-Chemical Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Stewart v. Verde River Irrigation & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. HAWAII INSURERS COUNCIL v. LingleHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Biggs v. BetlachCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  3. Northwest Fire District v. U.S. Home of Arizona Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. Biggs v. betlach/maciasArizona Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API