Legal Opinion
Wonders v. Pima County
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 12, 2004No. 2 CA-CV 2003-0090PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FLÓREZ, J.
¶ 1 Appellants Kent and Judith Wonders, as trustees of the Wonders Family Trust, appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Pima County in an action the Trust brought challenging the legality of Pima County’s native-plant preservation ordinance. We affirm.
¶ 2 The Trust is the developer of two subdivisions in Pima County — a 20.3-aere, nineteen-lot subdivision known as Critter Land I, and a 154-acre, 148-lot subdivision known as Critter Land II. Under Ordinance No.1998-39, incorporated into the Pima County Zoning Code at chapter 18.72 (the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Far East Conference v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mack Phillips v. Montgomery County, TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
- Coconino County v. Antco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- Puppies 'N Love v. City of PhoenixDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
- City of Tucson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- City of Tucson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.