Long v. Ryan
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Edwin A. Meserve, Shirley E. Meserve, and J. D. Taggart, for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The defendants appeal from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.
The action was brought to annul and cancel a deed purporting to have been executed on July 22, 1905, by the decedent, Sarah M. Ryan, conveying certain parcels of land to her two daughters, the defendants herein. On the day of its date the deed was delivered in a sealed envelope by the grantor to the Title Insurance & Trust Company as custodian with directions for its delivery upon certain contingencies to happen within a fixed period. • The contingencies did not happen within the time fixed and there were several…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bury v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Ruiz v. DowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Moore v. TrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Kenney v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Wittenbrock v. CassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Osborn v. OsbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Stone v. DailyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Allenbach v. RidenourNevada Supreme Court · 1929
- Bloor v. BloorWashington Supreme Court · 1919
- Wilcox v. HardistyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.