Legal Opinion
Moore v. Trott
California Supreme Court
Decided October 8, 1909No. L.A. No. 2103PublishedCited by 39 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
This is an action to quiet title to certain lands formerly the property of Patrick Moore, deceased. The plaintiff is Moore’s widow and administratrix, and the defendant, Mrs. George Trott, is the person named as grantee of said lands in two deeds which, on the tenth, day of May, 1906, were mailed by Moore to P. 0. Tietzen, cashier of the bank at Santa Maria, under cover with the following letter:—
“Arroto Grande, May 10th, 1905.
“Mr. P. C. Tietzen.
“Dear sir and friend, I am sending you some deeds to lands that I have made to be delivered to the parties in case of my not returning from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Bury v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Crocker v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Sprague v. WaltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- McQuaid v. Portland & Vancouver Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1889
- Gaston v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Moore v. TrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Snodgrass v. SnodgrassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Hunt v. WichtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Wilkerson v. SeibCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.