Legal Opinion

Ruiz v. Dow

California Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1896No. L. A. No. 97PublishedCited by 49 opinions

Appeal from, a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. W. B. Cope, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This is an action by the administrator of the estate of James Dow, deceased, to recover the sum of four thousand dollars from Rebecca Dow, wife of said deceased. Plaintiff claims the money to be the *494property of the estate of the deceased, and the wife claims the money to be her own by gift from the husband. The material facts may be briefly stated as follows: James Dow, a man of considerable property, consisting of lands and money, feeling that he was not long for this world, and desiring that his wife Rebecca should possess his estate without the expense attendant upon an administration in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bury v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Hurlburt v. . HurlburtNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Michael v. . FoilSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  4. Hanlon v. DohertyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Rosseau v. . BleauNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Moore v. TrottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Crocker v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Hynes v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  4. Horsman v. MadenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Kenney v. ParksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API