Allenbach v. Ridenour
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The main point in the case is whether or not there was a sufficient delivery of the deed from D.W. Ridenour to C.D. Ridenour, herein referred to generally as Carl. This question is not so much a question of fact as a question of law, our contention being that under the evidence a sufficient delivery was shown, that is to say, sufficient to satisfy the law. It must be borne in mind all the time that at the commencement of this action Carl Ridenour was in the…
2Cases cited72 opinions
- Williams v. KiddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Bury v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- In Re Estate of BlakeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Kley v. . HealyNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Reggio v. WarrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Evans v. BoneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
- Tarrant v. MonsonNevada Supreme Court · 1980
- Witham v. WithamOregon Supreme Court · 1937
- Watts v. ChoateMontana Supreme Court · 1945
- Home Savers, Inc. v. United Security Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.