Legal Opinion

State v. . Ferrell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 10, 1934PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

When the defendants named in the indictment on which this action was prosecuted were called to the bar of the court for their arraignment, the solicitor for the State, in behalf and with the approval of the judge, propounded to the defendants questions as to their pleas in accordance with tbe forms and procedure wbicb have been from time immemorial and are now in general use in this State. On his appeal to this Cour.t, the defendant, Clyde Ferrell, contends that his arraignment was void because the questions were propounded to him by the solicitor and not by the judge or by the clerk of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . JeffriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. State v. McCall.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  4. State v. . FrazierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  5. State v. GriffithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. State v. . HairstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. State v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. State v. . BiggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API