State v. Fowler
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.
The question for decision is whether the defendant’s statement to the sheriff that he had killed a man in South Carolina and was an escaped convict from that State was properly admitted in evidence against him on the present prosecution. The answer is to be evolved from the record.
We start with, the general rule that evidence of one offense is inadmissible to prove another and independent crime, the two being wholly disconnected and in no way related to each other. S. v. Choate, 228 N.C. 491, 46 S.E. 2d 476; S. v. Harris, 223 N.C. 697, 28 S.E. 2d 232; S. v. Smith, 204 N.C. 638, 169 S.E. 230;…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- State v. LyleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- State v. KentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. . WhitenerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. MaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.