Legal Opinion

State v. McCall.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 2, 1902PublishedCited by 20 opinions

INDICTMENT against Alexander and Samuel McCall, beard by Judge W. B. Council and a jury, at April Term, 1902, of tbe Superior Court of Bueke County. From a verdict of guilty and judgment thereon, the defendants- appealed. -

1Opinion of the CourtFurches, C. J.

The defendants are indicted for burning Concord Methodist Church. The offense is alleged to have been committed in McDowell County by Jack Keaton, as principal, and the defendants, Alexander McCall and Samuel McCall, as accessories before the fact. The defendant Keaton plead guilty, and the'McCalls plead not guilty, and the case was moved to Burke County for trial. Samuel is the son of Alexander McCall, and it was shown that some time before the church was burned, a mill belonging to. Rom. Brown had been burned, and Alexander McCall was charged with burning the mill, and had been arrested on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. . JeffriesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. State v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. State v. . ParishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  4. State v. . ShufordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  5. State v. . FrazierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  4. State v. . SmoakSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. State v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API