Legal Opinion

State v. Griffith

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 26, 1923PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wal:keb, J.,

after stating tbe case: We are of tbe opinion that tbe evidence, thus shortly stated, and interpreted according to tbe rule applied by this Court in determining tbe correctness of tbe ruling below refusing to grant judgment as of nonsuit, is sufficient to go to tbe jury upon tbe question of defendant’s guilt. There was motive, opportunity, and direct evidence connecting him (Griffith) with tbe commission of tbe crime, which is to be inferred from tbe nature and character of tbe tracks which led to tbe bouses of both men, tbe blunt-toed brogan-track to defendant Griffith’s bouse,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. Adams.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. State v. . HunterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. State v. . DanielsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. State v. . FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. State v. McCall.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. . StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. State v. PalmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. State v. StricklandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  5. State v. . McLeodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API