Legal Opinion

In re Cavallito

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 6, 1960No. 6508PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

The issue in the present appeal arises from the affirmance by the Board of Appeals of the examiner’s rejection of claim 1 of appellants’ application Serial No. 344,677 filed March 25,1953, for Bis- (N-Hetero-carbocyclic) Alkanes.

Appealed claim 1 reads as follows:

An organic compound selected from the group consisting of (A) those comprising two N-heterocarbocyclic radicals, each radical containing between three and five fused rings joined by an alkylene bridge attached to a nitrogen of each of said radicals, at least three of said rings being composed solely of carbon and nitrogen in the ring,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Application of OppenauerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1944

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Application of Frantz Lund and Wagn Ole GodtfredsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  2. Application of Maximilian Paul SchmidtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1961
  3. Application of Alexander R. SurreyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  4. Application of Chester John Cavallito and Allan Poe GrayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  5. Application of William C. Rainer, Edward M. Redding, Joseph J. Hitov, Arthur W. Sloan and William D. StewartCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API