Legal Opinion

Application of William C. Rainer, Edward M. Redding, Joseph J. Hitov, Arthur W. Sloan and William D. Stewart

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 2, 1967No. Patent Appeal 7668PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICH, Judge.

The appeal is from decisions of the Board of Appeals, 1 affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 2-6, 8-12, 17, 20, and 48-59 in application serial No. 12,339, filed March 2, 1960, entitled “Polyethylene.” Claims 18 and 63 have been allowed.

Introduction

The invention relates to graft copolymers of polyethylene and certain other compounds, their method of preparation, and articles made thereof. The following claims are typical of those rejected:

2. A process comprising irradiating normally solid polyethylene at a dosage of at least about 2 X 10° REP in contact with a material…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. DeForest Radio Co. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Application of Milton E. HerrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  3. Application of William C. Rainer, Edward M. Redding, Joseph J. Hitov, Arthur W. Sloan and William D. StewartCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  4. In re CavallitoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  5. Magat v. LaddDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1964

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Amgen, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Genetics Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  2. Almeida v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
  3. In re AngstadtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  4. Application of Alfred Marzocchi and Nicholas S. JanetosCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
  5. In re AngstadtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API