Legal Opinion
Application of Oppenauer
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 26, 1944No. Patent Appeal 4907PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming that of the Primary Examiner rejecting claims 64, 66, 68, 69, 72, 75, 78, 80 and 84 of an application for a patent on a “Process for Oxidizing Unsaturated Polycyclic Alcohols,” on the ground that they are broader than warranted by the disclosure. No references are relied on. Six claims were allowed.
The invention is described in the statement of the examiner as follows:
“The invention in this case consists in a process for producing unsaturated polycyclic ketones of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matheson v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
- Fishburn v. VincentCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1937
- In re DreshfieldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
- Cooper v. DowningCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1916
- Armstrong v. LevyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Application of Janis RobinsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of Walter Grimme, Werner Keil and Heinrich SchmitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Application of SmythCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
- In re CavallitoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Application of Charles R. BarrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.