Legal Opinion
Application of Alexander R. Surrey
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided December 15, 1966No. Patent Appeal 7536PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORLEY, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claim 17 in appellant’s application 1 entitled “4-Thiazolidones and Oxide Derivatives Thereof.”
The subject matter is evident from the claim, to which we have added emphasis to indicate the particular language giving rise to the issues of sufficiency of disclosure and new matter before us:
17. A compound of the formula
where Ar is a member of the group consist of phenyl, naphthyl, biphenylyl, furyl, pyridyl, pyrimidyl, thiazolyl, oxazolyl, quinolyl, isoquinolyl, and thienyl radicals and such…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Application of Oskar Sus and Werner SchaeferCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Application of Walter Grimme, Werner Keil and Heinrich SchmitzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Application of Chester John Cavallito and Allan Poe GrayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
- Application of Chester John Cavallito and Allan Poe GrayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- In re CavallitoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
3Cited by14 opinions
- Application of Janis RobinsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of Paul D. HarwoodCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Application of Marwan R. Kamal and Edgar R. RogierCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Application of Alexander R. SurreyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- CRUZ v. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.