Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Application of Chester John Cavallito and Allan Poe Gray

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided July 25, 1962No. Patent Appeal 6822PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Judge.

We are here concerned with the rejection of claims 1, 12-15, inclusive, and 35 of appellants’ application Serial No. 593,058, filed June 22, 1956, entitled “Organic Compounds”. Claims 2, 3, 4, 7, 9 and 11 have been allowed.

Typical of the claims on appeal are claim 1, directed to a composition of matter, and claim 12, directed to a process for preparing the composition of matter. These claims are as follows:

“1. Polycarbon lower alkanes substituted on different carbon atoms by: (a) one onium-N-attaeh-ed quaternary ammonium moiety having a radical weight, excluding the anion, not in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schering Corporation v. GilbertCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1946
  2. Application of Oskar Sus and Werner SchaeferCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  3. Application of Chester John Cavallito and Allan Poe GrayCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  4. In re CavallitoCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1960
  5. Application of MooreCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Application of Frantz Lund and Wagn Ole GodtfredsenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  2. Application of Lynn B. Wakefield and Frederick C. FosterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  3. Application of Alexander R. SurreyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  4. In re GardnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
  5. Application of Noel F. AlbertsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API