Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Gresham v. Delaney

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 6, 1942No. 33,313PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

See State ex rel. Gresham v. Delaney, 212 Minn. 519, 4 N. W. (2d) 348.

In a civil action pending before respondent, a justice of the peace of the city of St. Paul, relator was defendant. She demanded a trial by jury and paid the statutory fee therefor of $12 for one day’s attendance of a jury. Respondent refused to issue a venire to the proper officer to summon a jury unless relator also advanced the costs and expenses, consisting of justice’s and constable’s fees, estimated to be $12. Relator refused to deposit the costs and expenses, claiming that the justice had no power…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Minneapolis Threshing-Machine Co. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899
  2. State ex rel. Prall v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Swanson v. AlworthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. In Re Estate of StenzelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  5. State Ex Rel. Gresham v. DelaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. McLean Distributing Co. v. Brewery & Beverage Drivers, Warehousemen & Helpers Union, Local No. 993Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Victor Co. v. State Ex Rel. HeadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  4. Latourell v. DempseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  5. Waters v. PutnamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API