Lockwood v. Bock
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Motion to dismiss the defendant’s appeal from the orders of the district court for Eamsey county, Kerr, J., presiding, which are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Collins, J.1
This appeal is from two orders of the same import practically, — one being an order for judgment on the pleadings, in plaintiff’s favor; the other, an order refusing to set it aside. The respondent moves to dismiss on the ground that neither of said orders is appealable. It is well settled that the first-mentioned, ordering judgment on the pleadings, is not. Lamb v. McCanna, 14 Minn. 385, (513.) The one subsequently made, whereby defendant’s motion to vacate a non-appealable order was denied, is clearly within the rule stated in Brown v. Minn. Thresher Mfg. Co., 44 Minn. 322, (46…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cochran v. ToherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
- Brown v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Peterson v. BentleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Barrie v. Northern Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Security State Bank v. BrechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Thompson v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- County of Renville v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.