Shema v. Thorpe Bros.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the district court granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment under Rule 56 of Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendant moves to dismiss the appeal.
Plaintiffs concede that this court’s jurisdiction as to appeals is limited to those instances set forth in M. S. A. 605.09. However, they contend that an order for summary judgment is an adjudication of the merits and therefore an appealable order under § 605. 09(3) which provides that an appeal may be taken:
“From an order involving the merits of the action or some part thereof;”
This court has consistently held…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Chapman v. DorseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Anderson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Seeling, Jr. v. Deposit Bank Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Twin City Motor Bus Co. v. RechtzigelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Brown v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Emme v. C.O.M.B., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Gebeke v. Arthur Mercantile CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Muggenburg Ex Rel. Muggenburg v. LeightonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- LeRoy v. Figure Skating Club of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.