Legal Opinion
State v. Wilson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 6, 2001No. C3-00-2071PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RUSSELL A. ANDERSON, Justice.
While in prison, Nathaniel James Wilson requested disposition of an untried complaint against him under the Uniform Mandatory Disposition of Detainers Act (UMDDA). Minn.Stat. § 629.292 (2000). The UMDDA provides that within six months of the receipt of such request or within such additional time as the district court for good cause may grant, the complaint shall be brought to trial. Id., subd. 3. If, after such request, the complaint is not brought to trial within that period, the court no longer has jurisdiction over the complaint and shall dismiss it with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. PflepsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- People v. BellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Kemp v. HodgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
- McIntosh v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Scott v. Minneapolis Police Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Mendota Golf, LLP v. City of Mendota HeightsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- People v. CarrColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Buckley v. Park Building Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. VONBEHRENCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.