Legal Opinion

State v. Hart

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 2, 2006No. A05-2066PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GILDEA, Justice.

This case presents the narrow question of whether, after a district court issues a pretrial order dismissing a criminal complaint “with prejudice” and “in the interests of justice,” the state can refile the complaint and obtain a writ of mandamus compelling the district court to make a probable cause determination on the refiled complaint. The court of appeals granted, in part, the state’s petition for writ of mandamus and vacated the district court’s dismissal order, finding the order to be an abuse of discretion. The court of appeals concluded that the state was free…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. KrotzerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. State v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  3. State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
  4. McIntosh v. DavisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  5. In re Vasquez-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. SahrSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. State v. BoehlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  3. Klapmeier v. Cirrus Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
  4. State of Minnesota v. Douglas John OlsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
  5. State of Minnesota v. Rafael Alfonso BanksCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API