Legal Opinion
Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee Hosiery
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 4, 1997No. Civil No. 96-1949PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Presently before this court are the following motions: the motion in limine of Carl Hittinger, Esquire, attorney for the defendants, Sara Lee Hosiery, et al., (hereinafter “Sara Lee”), to exclude from trial the expert reports and testimony of expert witnesses of Lithuanian Commerce Corporation, Ltd., (hereinafter “LCC”), pursuant to Rule 37(c)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P. and Rule 702, Fed. R. Evid; the cross-motion of Gregory Saputelli, Esquire, attorney for the plaintiff, for an order declaring that the defendants have waived all objections to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Charles Kannankeril v. Terminix International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee HosieryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- ID Security Systems Canada, Inc. v. Checkpoint Systems, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee HosieryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee HosieryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- HFGL Ltd. v. Alex Lyon & Son Sales Managers & Auctioneers, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.