Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee Hosiery

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided June 29, 1998No. CIV. A. 96-1949PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*454OPINION

ORLOFSKY, District Judge:

This acrimonious dispute arises out of a commercial transaction between an American pantyhose manufacturer and its Lithuanian distributor. The distributor, Lithuanian Commerce Corporation, Ltd. (“LCC”), alleges that the manufacturer, Sara Lee Hosiery, Sara Lee Hosiery International, Sara Lee International, and Sara Lee Corporation (collectively “Sara Lee”), donated a large volume of pantyhose to an international relief organization which distributed them to nations neighboring Lithuania. Through black marketeers, these pantyhose flooded the Lithuanian market at…

2Cases cited101 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Allen v. Sybase, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
  2. Tucker v. Sierra BuildersCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
  3. Bracco Diagnostics Inc. v. Bergen Brunswig Drug Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
  4. Naporano Iron & Metal Co. v. American Crane Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
  5. Loeffel Steel Products, Inc. v. Delta Brands, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API