Legal Opinion
Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee Hosiery
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 23, 1999No. Civil Action 96-1949PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORLOFSKY, District Judge.
This case, involving an acrimonious dispute between the manufacturer of L’eggs® pantyhose and one of its distributors, has generated numerous motions, four published opinions, 1 six weeks of trial testimony, and now it is almost at an end. This opinion is, hopefully, dare I say it, my “last L’eggs.” The history of this epic litigation is set forth in great detail in the four published opinions which have been filed in this case and will not be repeated here.
At the opening of their case on their Counterclaims, Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs, Sara Lee…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Hellenic Lines Ltd. v. RhoditisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Balance Dynamics Corporation v. Schmitt Industries, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- In Re ParmalatDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Mayflower Transit, LLC v. PrinceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
- In Re StarLink Corn Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
- Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee HosieryDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.