Legal Opinion
Lithuanian Commerce Corp. v. Sara Lee Hosiery
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 30, 2002No. Civil Action 96-1949PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ORLOFSKY, District Judge.
Having prevailed on their motion for judgment as a matter of law in the first trial of this matter almost four years ago, Defendants, Sara Lee Corporation and Sara Lee Hosiery, (“Sara Lee”), now, at the close of Plaintiff, Lithuanian Commerce Corporation’s (“LCC”), case upon retrial, have again filed a Rule 50(a) motion, hoping that history will repeat itself. Sara Lee has moved for judgment as a matter of law on seven distinct grounds. In its motion, Sara Lee asks this Court to apply well-established doctrines of contract law to the distinct factual…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Lightning Lube, Inc. v. Witco Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Brady v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- McDermott International, Inc. v. WilanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Gennari v. Weichert Co. RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Werwinski v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- G & F Graphic Services, Inc. v. Graphic Innovators, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Video Pipeline, Inc. v. Buena Vista Home Entertainment, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Steinman v. MALAMEDCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- TransWeb, LLC v. 3M Innovative Properties Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- In Re WellNx Marketing & Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.