Nash v. Yount
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Judge.
We hold that Judge Crissman was correct and the judgment must be affirmed. It seems clear that there is no genuine issue as to the following facts: The plaintiff and defendants entered into a contract under the terms of which the plaintiff was to receive a ten percent commission on property sold. Excluded from the property on which the plaintiff was to receive the commission was “land lying east of Cubb Creek, adjoining Elmer Lowe’s property and north of State Road servicing Tom Thumb Plant.” The sale was made within the listing period.
If the phrase in quotation marks above is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Crockett v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of CharlotteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Brokers, Inc. v. High Point City Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cleland v. Children's Home, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Brown v. ScismCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Rockwell v. RockwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Cleland v. Children's Home, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
- Jim Lorenz, Inc. v. O'HAIRECourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011