Rockwell v. Rockwell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
In her first assignment of error, defendant contends the court erred in finding as fact that plaintiff had no obligation to presently designate defendant as beneficiary under the annuity plan. This more closely resembles a conclusion of law. A finding which is designated as a finding of fact, but in character is essentially a conclusion of law, will be treated as a conclusion of law on appeal, Britt v. Britt, 49 N.C. App. 463, 271 S.E. 2d 921 (1980), and is reviewable de novo upon appeal. Humphries v. City of Jacksonville, 300 N.C. 186, 265 S.E. 2d 189 (1980).
The parties’…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Snyder v. FreemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Humphries v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Britt v. BrittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Nash v. YountCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Cox v. CoxCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
3Cited by4 opinions
- Southern Power Company v. Cleveland CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- Morris v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Charles v. CharlesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
- Southern Power Company v. Cleveland CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022