Crockett v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Charlotte
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
There is one principle question for us to determine: Does defendant, as beneficiary under a deed of trust containing the language above described, have a lawful right to require the proposed purchasers of the property secured by said deed of trust to agree to pay an increased rate of interest as a condition to its assent to a transfer of the security property, and the assumption of the loan ?
Plaintiff contends that since the due-on-sale clause permits defendant to declare the entire debt due and payable when the owner of the property (mortgagor) sells it without the consent…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Tucker v. Lassen Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Baker v. Loves Park Savings & Loan Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
- Malouff v. Midland Federal Savings and Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Brenner v. Little Red School House, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Don Brown, Josef H. Miller and Allen L. McAlear v. Avemco Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Sonny Arnold, Inc. v. Sentry Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1982
- Spanish Oaks, Inc. v. Hy-Vee, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
- Edwards v. WestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.