Legal Opinion

Crockett v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Charlotte

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 14, 1976No. 36PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

There is one principle question for us to determine: Does defendant, as beneficiary under a deed of trust containing the language above described, have a lawful right to require the proposed purchasers of the property secured by said deed of trust to agree to pay an increased rate of interest as a condition to its assent to a transfer of the security property, and the assumption of the loan ?

Plaintiff contends that since the due-on-sale clause permits defendant to declare the entire debt due and payable when the owner of the property (mortgagor) sells it without the consent…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. La Sala v. American Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Tucker v. Lassen Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Baker v. Loves Park Savings & Loan Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Malouff v. Midland Federal Savings and Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Brenner v. Little Red School House, Ltd.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Don Brown, Josef H. Miller and Allen L. McAlear v. Avemco Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. Sonny Arnold, Inc. v. Sentry Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Spanish Oaks, Inc. v. Hy-Vee, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Edwards v. WestCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API