Cleland v. Children's Home, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
The defendant assigns error to the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment and to the granting of plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment. The defendant contends that the *156deed provision governing apportionment of ad valorem taxes is clear and unambiguous. It further contends that the provision establishes as a matter of law that defendant is not obligated to pay any portion of taxes assessed on property that was exempt from taxation immediately prior to the conveyance.
Summary judgment is proper only if “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact. . . .”…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lane v. ScarboroughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Root v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Silver v. North Carolina Board of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Nash v. YountCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
3Cited by34 opinions
- Taha v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
- Whirlpool Corp. v. Dailey Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Fairview Developers, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Interstate Narrow Fabrics, Inc. v. Century USA, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2003
- Department of Transportation v. IdolCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.