Legal Opinion

Stamey v. Rutherpordton Electric Membership Corp.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 31, 1958No. 237PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

In this Court the defendant Rutherfordton Electric Membership Corporation filed a demurrer ore tenus on the ground that the amended complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. This it had a right to do. Lamm v. Crumpler, 238 N.C. 717, 65 S.E. 2d 336. Defendant reduced its demurrer ore tenus to writing, and specified the grounds of objection to the amended complaint as follows: One, the amended complaint fails to state facts as to how, or by what means, one of the nonenergized and dead wires, which plaintiff’s intestate was on a pole erecting, came in contact…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Essick v. City of LexingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Hedrick v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Parrish v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Guthrie v. . GockingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Conley v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Spartan Equipment Co. v. Air Placement Equipment Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Wyatt v. North Carolina Equipment CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Cantrell v. Woodhill Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Skipper v. CheathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Brevard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API