Legal Opinion
Parrish v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided May 20, 1942PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff in a crossing collision in the city of Rocky Mount between an automobile operated by him and a train operated by defendant.
The defendant, before filing answer or demurrer or obtaining an extension of time to plead, moved to strike certain paragraphs of the complaint as being "irrelevant, redundant and impertinent," specifically relying on C. S., 537.
The matter objectionable to the defendant was as follows:(1) In support of his allegation of negligence in the maintenance and care of the crossing the…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
- Northern Central Railway Co. v. State ex rel. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
- Shelton v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Edwards v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Childress v. Lake Erie & Western RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- South v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. Freeman v. PonderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Bailey v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- Shaw v. Soo Line RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.