Legal Opinion

Skipper v. Cheatham

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 1959No. 166PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Are the facts alleged, considered in the light most favorable to plaintiff, sufficient to support findings (1) that defendants were negligent in maintiaining the scales in their store entrance, and (2) that isuoh negligence proximately 'Caused plaintiff’s injury?

Defendants were not insurers of the safety of their customers. Sledge v. Wagoner, 248 N.C. 631, 104 S.E. 2d 195. The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur does not apply. Copeland v. Phthisic, 245 N.C. 580, 96 S.E. 2d 697. No inference of negligence 'arises from the mere fact of an accident or injury. Fleming v. Twiggs, 244 N.C. 666, 94 S.E.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fanelty v. Rogers Jewelers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Lassiter v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Fleming v. TwiggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Mills v. RichardsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Lee v. H. L. Green & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Raper v. McCRORY-McLELLAN CORPORATIONSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Boykin v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Hinson v. Cato's, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. Long v. National Food Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API