Legal Opinion
Hedrick v. Graham
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided January 11, 1957No. 377PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
It is familiar learning that a demurrer admits the truth of factual averments well stated and such relevant inferences as maybe deduced therefrom, but it does not admit any legal inferences or conclusions of law asserted by the pleader, and that we are required to construe the pleading challenged by a demurrer liberally with a view to substantial justice between the parties and to make every reasonable intendment in favor of the pleader. G.S. 1-151; McKinley v. Hinnant, 242 N.C. 245, 87 S.E. 2d 568; McKinney v. High Point, 237 N.C. 66, 74 S.E. 2d 440.
The complaint alleges, “the State Highway…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- United States v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Dohany v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Piedmont Canteen Service, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Wofford v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Charlotte-Mecklenburg Hospital Authority v. North Carolina Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.