Legal Opinion

Essick v. City of Lexington

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 9, 1950No. 678PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSea well, J.

On this appeal we have to deal with a variety of unusual claims set up by the appellees and controverted by the appellants, and quite a number of novel concepts of applicable law relating to the defenses available in the instant case. The legal controversy arises in part over the apparent inability to reconcile provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act with the common law, which it very substantially amends, and in many particulars, indeed those most essential to the effectiveness of the act, it abrogates.

•We may observe initially that the very life of the Workmen’s Compensation Act lies…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Brown v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  2. Brown v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Tscheiller v. National Weaving Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. McCune v. Rhodes-Rhyne Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Pleasant v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Burgess Ex Rel. Burgess v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Lovette v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Warner v. LederSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. AdamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1966

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API