Essick v. City of Lexington
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSea well, J.
On this appeal we have to deal with a variety of unusual claims set up by the appellees and controverted by the appellants, and quite a number of novel concepts of applicable law relating to the defenses available in the instant case. The legal controversy arises in part over the apparent inability to reconcile provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act with the common law, which it very substantially amends, and in many particulars, indeed those most essential to the effectiveness of the act, it abrogates.
•We may observe initially that the very life of the Workmen’s Compensation Act lies…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brown v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Brown v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Tscheiller v. National Weaving Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- McCune v. Rhodes-Rhyne Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
3Cited by46 opinions
- Pleasant v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Burgess Ex Rel. Burgess v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Lovette v. LloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Warner v. LederSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. AdamsIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.