Legal Opinion
Sinetos v. Department of Motor Vehicles
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 18, 1984No. Civ. 23279PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
In this appeal we hold that judicial review of an administrative decision of the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) is foreclosed by plaintiff’s failure to file his petition for administrative mandamus within the time provided by statute. Accordingly, we shall reverse the judgment of the superior court granting plaintiff relief and order the petition dismissed.
Following administrative hearings the DMV ordered plaintiff Jim Sinetos to surrender his class 1 driver’s license because he no longer met the necessary physical requirements. (Veh. Code, § 12813.) A class 1 license…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Austin v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Crumpler v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Fredrichsen v. City of LakewoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Castro v. Sacramento County Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- California Standardbred Sires Stakes Committee, Inc. v. California Horse Racing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Edwin F. David, on Behalf of Himself and a Class of All Persons Similarly Situated v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Music v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.