Legal Opinion

Castro v. Sacramento County Fire Protection District

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 23, 1996No. C021147PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, P. J.

Code of Civil Procedure section 473 (section 473) provides the court shall vacate any “default judgment or dismissal” against a party resulting from attorney mistake, inadvertence, surprise or neglect. We are asked to decide if a “dismissal” within the meaning of this provision includes a judgment of dismissal for failure of plaintiff to comply with the statute of limitations. The superior court concluded section 473 relief is unavailable in those circumstances. We agree with the superior court.

I

Plaintiff sustained personal injuries on October 4, 1993, when the vehicle she…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Peltier v. McCloud River RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Shain v. SresovichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hanooka v. PivkoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Kupka v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Graham v. BeersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Leader v. Health Industries of America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Garcia v. HejmadiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. Braun v. Bureau of State AuditsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Maynard v. BrandonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API