Legal Opinion

Fredrichsen v. City of Lakewood

California Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1971No. L. A. 29924PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PETERS, J.

is an appeal by plaintiff, Anne Fredrichsen, from a

judgment in favor of the City of Lakewood, after the city’s demurrer to the first amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend on grounds that she had not alleged compliance with the claim requirements of section 900 et seq. of the Government Code. We have concluded that the facts alleged in the first amended complaint, if true, would estop the city from asserting the claim statute as a defense.

The allegations of the first amended complaint may be summarized as follows: On May 10, 1969, plaintiff fell while walking…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Cruise v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  5. Rand v. AndreattaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. John R. v. Oakland Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Minsky v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Roberts v. Haltom CityTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Pritchard v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Castaneda v. Department of Corrections & RehabilationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API