Ex parte Lichtenstein
California Supreme Court
Application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMorrison, C. J.
The petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this case sets forth “that a complaint was filed against the petitioner in the Police Court of the city and county of San Francisco, charging that he was engaged in and was conducting the business of a pawnbroker in said city, and as such received from a person therein named one gold watch as a pledge in consideration of a loan of thirty dollars, and did then and there unlawfully and wilfully charge on said loan a rate of interest in excess of two per cent per month, to wit, interest at the rate of four per cent per month, and thereupon the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Jackson v. ShawlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Ex Parte KoserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by13 opinions
- Carter v. Seaboard Finance Co.California Supreme Court · 1949
- Levinson v. BoasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- In Re FullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Ex Parte SohnckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- In Re WasherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.