Loewenthal v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 37284, and G. A. 7661 (T. D. 35048).
1Opinion of the Court
De Vries, Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:
These are appeals from two decisions of tbe Board of General Appraisers. Tbe importations were of beaded articles in several forms: (1) Tunics composed of lace nets, beaded, without following any figure or design; (2) motifs, garnitures, and gimps of beads with net foundation, tbe beads forming designs of various forms, tbe entire being ready to be applied to garments, and also running lengths or strips of such beaded designs likewise on net foundations ready to be applied to garments.
It is conceded by all parties that tbe merchandise is in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Arthur v. LaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Hartranft v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Knauth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Arthur v. RheimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Solomon v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- American Bead Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- Industrial Operations, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- United States v. MacyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- United States v. Veit, Son & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.