Industrial Operations, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Lawrence, Judge:
The merchandise which gives rise to this controversy- consists of motorcycle speedometers represented by plaintiff's exhibit 1 together with certain flexible shafts and couplings illustrated by plaintiff’s exhibit 2 and illustrative exhibit 3, respectively, for use in attaching said speedometers to motorcycles.
The speedometers were classified by the collector of customs as devices intended or suitable for measuring distance or speed, valued at more than $2.25 but not more than $5 each, pursuant to the terms of paragraph 368 (a) (1) (2) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. §…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. LyonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Loewenthal v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Knauth v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
- Comstock v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
3Cited by25 opinions
- Lucas Electrical Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
- Harrigan Auto Parts Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
- Vandegrift Forwarding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Rocky Cycle Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Alltransport, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.