Knauth v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 29047 (T. D. 32681).
1Opinion of the CourtDe Vries, Judge
The merchandise is invoiced as “dull black lining calf leather.” It was made from whole (not split) calfskins to be used for lining leather bags and is shown by the record to be tanned and dressed.
*59Duty was laid thereupon as “calfskins * * * • tanned and dressed,” under the provisions of paragraph 451 of the tariff act of 1909. The appellants protested and, their protest having been overruled by the Board of General Appraisers, appealed to this court, asserting that the goods are dutiable as “grain leather” under the ■proviso to paragraph 450, reading as follows:
450. * * * Provided, That on…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Magone v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Arthur v. LaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Brennan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1905
- Arthur v. RheimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. Reiss & BradyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Loewenthal v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
- Arnold Sorensin Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
- Industrial Operations, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
- Bluefries New York, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.