Legal Opinion

Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against Preloznik

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1992No. 91-0232-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Attorney disciplinary proceeding; public reprimand imposed.

*138The Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility (Board) appealed and the respondent, Attorney Joseph F. Preloznik, cross-appealed from the referee's conclusions of law in respect to professional misconduct and his recommendation for discipline and for the assessment of costs of this disciplinary proceeding. The Board appealed from the referee's conclusion that it failed to establish by clear and convincing evidence that Attorney Preloznik engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation by obtaining…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. PolichWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against PreloznikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. PolichWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. PolichWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Walter W. Stern, IIIWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API