Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Margaret Bach

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 2016No. 2015AP001958-DPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1.

2Per curiam

We review the report of Referee James J. Winiarski recommending that the court publicly reprimand Attorney Margaret Bach for professional misconduct and order her to pay the full costs of this disciplinary proceeding, which total $14,765.09 as of August 26, 2016.

¶ 2. No appeal has been filed from the referee's report and recommendation, so we review the matter pursuant to Supreme Court Rule (SCR) 22.17(2). After considering the referee's report and the record in this matter, we agree with the referee's determination that the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR) proved by clear, satisfactory,…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against InglimoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. PolichWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. HammisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. GroganWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Vladimir M. GorokhovskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Vladimir M. GorokhovskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025
  3. Bach v. Office of Lawyer RegulationDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
  4. Bach v. Office of Lawyer RegulationUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API