Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Parks (In Re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Daniel Parks)

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 2018No. 2016AP000085-DPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1 Attorney Daniel Parks has appealed a report filed by Referee William Eich concluding that Attorney Parks committed eight of 14 alleged counts of professional misconduct and recommending that Attorney Parks' license to practice law in Wisconsin be suspended for 14 months, rather than the two-year suspension sought by the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR). The referee considered Attorney Parks' objection to costs and recommends we impose the full costs of this proceeding on Attorney Parks. The OLR did not seek restitution and the referee did not recommend a restitution award.

¶ 2 In his…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. EcholsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Disciplinary Proceedings Against ArthurWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Gehr v. City of SheboyganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Matthew R. MeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel ParksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel ParksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert T. MalloyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2025
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel ParksWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API