Legal Opinion
Perales v. Department of Human Resources Development
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 14, 1973No. Civ. 1630PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRANSON, J.
Appellant petitioned the superior court for a writ of mandate, pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5, directing respondents to grant his claim for unemployment insurance benefits. He appeals from a judgment denying the writ.
During the 1969 canning season appellant was employed by Hunt- Wesson Foods, Inc., where he earned sufficient wages to qualify for unemployment insurance benefits. After the canning season ended he went to work pruning peach trees for a farmer near Waterford, California. Appellant pruned trees for about nine days; he was paid 75 cents a tree…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- California Department of Human Resources Development v. JavaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Bunny's Waffle Shop, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- California Employment Commission v. Butte County Rice Growers Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Johnston v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Norman v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Amador v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Zorrero v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Ettinger v. Board of Medical Quality AssuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.