Legal Opinion

Amador v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1984No. S.F. 24577PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BIRD, C. J.

Is a worker disqualified from collecting unemployment insurance benefits when she has been discharged for wilfully refusing to perform work which she reasonably and in good faith believed would jeopardize the health of others?

I

Nelly Amador appeals from a judgment of the superior court rejecting her petition for a writ of mandate. She sought to compel the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board (board) to vacate its ruling that she was ineligible for unemployment insurance benefits because she had been discharged for “misconduct.” (Unemp. Ins. Code, § 1256.0.1)

The San Mateo…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People v. SimsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Gibson v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Lacy v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. California Employment Commission v. Butte County Rice Growers Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Mark Eilrich v. Bernard J. RemasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  2. Flores v. Transamerica HomeFirst, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Watts v. CrawfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Robinson v. Hewlett-Packard Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. Bronco Wine Co. v. Frank A. Logoluso FarmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API